Latoyna Poole et al. v. Hawkeye Area Community Action Program et al. (Brief)
[ send me this essay ]
This 3 page paper provides a brief of this case involving the issue of relevancy and materiality. Those issues are the focus of the brief that outlines a case about children who were poisoned due to lead based paint present in a rental property. No additional sources cited.
Filename: SA408Two.rtf

Laytime; The Calculation And Conditions Surrounding the its Use and Calculation
[ send me this essay ]
This 22 page paper looks at the maritime issue of laytime as seen in charterparty contracts. The way it is calculated and what will and will not count as laytime is discussed with reference to actual arbitration's and contracts. The bibliography cites 9 sources.
Filename: TElaytim.wps

Legal Analysis of a Slip-and-fall Case
[ send me this essay ]
An 11 page extensive analysis of a hypothetical slip-and-fall lawsuit. In this scenario, Tom Hansen slipped and fell while shopping at the Apex Supermarket, incurring a severe hip injury. Mr. Hansen’s accident was due to a spill of an oily liquid on the floor, which created a hazard. Mr. Hansen seeks legal counsel as to whether to pursue a lawsuit against Apex Supermarket in order to receive monetary damages for his injury, but he wishes assurance as to whether or not his case would actually receive a jury trial, or be dismissed due to a summary judgment. The writer cites 3 cases in arguing that Mr. Hansen should not pursue his suit. No bibliography is offered.
Filename: khhansen.rtf

Legal Brief / U.S. Supreme Court Decision # 3
[ send me this essay ]
New York Times v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1991). Primary issue is whether or not the government has the privilege of enjoining the press prior to publications whenever it feels that national security is at stake.
Filename: Legalbr3.wps

Legal Brief / U.S. Supreme Court Decision # 5
[ send me this essay ]
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 109 S.Ct. 2533, 105 L.Ed.2d 242, Argued in 1989. From case : Since the State of Texas conceded that the actions of burning the flag were expressive conduct, the Court had to decide whether the State's regulation of flag burning related to suppression of free speech in order to determine which standard to apply. Then the Court had to decide whether the State had an interest in regulating the speech which overrode the First Amendment protections.
Filename: Sct.wps

Legal Brief : Gibson v. Mayor :
[ send me this essay ]
A 3 page paper that includes the case name and number, a brief synopsis of the facts of the case, the charges made by Gibson against the mayor and council, the investigation, and what the courts ruled. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: PGlggbs.rtf

Legal Case Analysis
[ send me this essay ]
In 5 pages, the author discusses a legal case scenario using Lyle v. Durham. A memo was created using the facts of the case to make a summation and a judgement concerning the case of Todd v. Gardner. It was decided whether the defendant or the plaintiff in the case was legally the rightful owner of the engagement ring. No additional sources cited.
Filename: Legalc.wps

Legal Case Briefs
[ send me this essay ]
A 25 page document that contains short legal briefs on the following cases: Abrams v. US; Barron v. City of Baltimore; Brown v. Board of Education; Buckley v. Valeo; Cantwell v. State of Connecticut; Da Jonge v. Oregon; Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire; Dred Scot v. Sanford; Engel v. Vitale; Everson v. Board of Education; Francis v. Resweber; Gitlow v. US; Griswold v. Connecticut; Mapp v. Ohio; Marbury v. Madison; McCollum v. Board of Education; Minersville School District v. Gobitis; N.Y. Times v. US; National Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie; Near v. Minnesota; Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart; Palko v. Connecticut; Plessy v. Ferguson; Roe v. Wade; Schenck v. US; University of California v. Bakke; Weeks v. US; Wolf v. Colorado; and Worcester v. State of Georgia. These briefs are available in whole or in parts. Please email us for more information if you would like to purchase one or more individual briefs.
Filename: 99brfs29.rtf

Legal Memo / N.J. Supreme Court Decision # 1a
[ send me this essay ]
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors Memo reviews and analyzes an key 1960 New Jersey Decision regarding manufacturer and dealer liability. Rather than strictly adhering to the fact that a sales contract was signed, the Court in this case looked at the predicament in which a buyer is placed when involved in such a large, technical purchase as an automobile. The court also examined marketing philosophy and the media used to advertise to better decide whether or not the defendants could truly be relieved of the responsibilities that the contract as claimed.
Filename: Legalme2.wps